Some observations

During the last week , I was in Trayambekeshwar, a place devoted for Lord Shiva's Jyotirlinga; Shanisignapur, a place devoted to Lord Shani and Shiridi, a place devoted to Sai Baba.

As regards, the first image (taken from Trayambekshwar) , I ran through the Articles 25 to 28 of the Constitution of India. If we read Art. 25(1) with Art. 26(2)(b), we would find that any religious institution has the right to restrict the other religion people from entering the premesis of the Hindu Temple. As per Honorable SC in the case of Venkataramanna Devaru v. State of Mysore (AIR 1958 SC 255) IT WAS HELD THAT:- "...Hence, a right of religious denominition under Art. 26 (2)(b) e.g., to ex-communicate a member on religious grounds, cannot be taken away or restricted. On the ground that it would affect civil rights of such members, including the rights of benefecial care or enjoyment of denominational propertirs.

As regards, second image, it was clarified by the Honorable SC in the case of Sarup Singh v. State of Punjab (1959 sc 860) that:- Each religious denominition or organisation enjoys complete autonomy in the matter of deciding as to what tites and ceremonies are essential according to the tenats of the religion they hold. So if in a case a woman is not allowed to enter the platform of the Lord Shani temple, it may not be arbitrary or violative of Art. 14 or may not hinder any of the rights of a woman under Art. 25 of the Constitution, if in a case the rites of the pooja, for Lord Shani prescribes that the woman are not allowd to enter the platform for pleasing and worshipping the diety.

As regards the third images is concerned, it is taken from a place ner Shiridi, where it is prevelant that a Buffalo, Ox etc., would churn and walk around the sugar cane mill (grinding mill), a person would keep inserting the sugar cane from one side and ollect the sugar cane juice in the pot.

Do you think it is 'ruelty'to the animal as per the Prevention of cruelty against the Animal Act 1963?

Drug makers consolidating in India

This is in reference to the public announcement by Pfizer Inc., to raise its shareholding in its Indian arm Pfizer Ltd., from 41.23% to 75%.This decision comes a fortnight after Swiss drug multinational Novartis AG announced its plan to raise its share holding in Indian subsidiary Novartis India Ltd to 90%, from the current 51%, through a tender offer to public shareholders.
Offlately, it has been observed that the pharmaceutical corporations are now in a mood for consolidating its shareholdings, especiallly when the share prices are all time low due to financial turmoil. This consolodation would pave the way for these corporations to delist there shares from the stock exchanges and would have a free hand over the affairs of the corporations away from stock exchange and SEBI interferences.

Why the firms would like to consolidate their shareholdings?

· The growth potential the Indian economy offers is huge with about INR 55,000 Crores in the market and every prudent businessman would like to have the most of this growth opportuinity.
· Ceratin issues related to Transfer pricing (arms length and other types of transactions) as per section 90- 94 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
· There would be synergy in working and there would be proper management control and there would be no Board room clashes or deadlocks (as the foreign firms want to increase their holdings beyond 74% as under Indian corporate law an investor with at least 26% stake can block any special resolution).
· The corporations are getting their shares for so cheap , then why not have it. They know the maket is not properly valuing there shares at this time so its bettre to go for buy-back.
· There is transfer of technolgy from the more developed and modern laboratories of these MNC’s and definitely these MNC’s would not like to share this with the other Indian counterparts.